Gravity and The Unified Theory                                           
The Physical Means of How Gravity Works and at last, The Unified Theory.

Author: Eric Sabo East Haddam, CT

Home Page - December 25, 2005                            
The last obstacle to developing The Unified Theory has always been solving the mystery of how Gravity works. This site is the result of 40 years of observation and reflection of how things work and why they work the way they do. The gravitational explanation contained is correct, self evident, and thus, allows for the rest to logically follow. (It is a "work in progress".)

I have constructed an anti-gravity prototype device that's ready for testing.
We require funding to enter that phase. Anyone interested?
"You could discover the secret of eternal life and you would still get trampled by people running to the nearest hamburger stand."- Walter Babin....... "I should have opened a hamburger stand."- Eric Sabo


Click here for; The Federal Reserve/Payment Gateway Plan
 
 



American Energy Independence - T. Boone Pickens; 

The Final Analysis;

 The U.S. Is #1 in the world in Natural Gas production, thanks in a large part, to Boone Pickens. He started the ball rolling and the industry ran with it. There are some that are unhappy with fracking. The sad truth is, the DOLLAR is backed by oil and gas. Has been since august 15th 1971. All the world currencies revolve around the Dollar and all countries are happy with that arrangement. It eliminates confusion and destabilization. That's why we don't see a rush to alternative energy sources. We could easily supply all the power we need with solar and wind but what would back the Dollar..... That's why we see the Global Warming “debate”.... Petroleum is here to stay. The U.S. Could be #1 in oil production by 2016 if the Bakken is developed. The people who live in the Bakken won't be happy. But it would be a patriotic sacrifice and duty on their part, (albeit against their will) so that the nation as a whole, can maintain our collective way of life. Because the Bakken extends into Alberta, the best course is to give Boone Pickens his North American Energy Alliance so that the Dollar can remain strong in our future. At the same time, opposition to the Keystone pipeline is really counter productive to maintaining the strength of the Dollar. Moving away from coal is a good idea. Adding more nuclear in the Integral Fast Breeder Reactor (IFBR) format is a great option. Boone wants a North American Energy Alliance. I say we should get it done.

Gravity and the Unified Theory is not unlike a musical composition where all the parts must fit together in harmony.
Credit for overall development of this site must be shared with Walter Babin of Rodney, Ontario and
in the gravity area, David Tombe of Belfast, Northern Ireland.
 

Gravity Quick Version

Author: Eric Sabo East Haddam, CT
 Dec 25, 2005
Updated Feb. 18, 2010

 

 

 

I estimate that 99.99% of the people on this planet of 6.6 Billion are totally unaware that the mechanism of how gravity works remains to be explained. To most, you drop a pan on your foot, and it hurts. It’s a sad statement.

Today, everyone is a specialist, concerned with their own particular area of interest. Being a jack of all somewhat fairly technical trades and master of none, I have always been concerned with and observant of all things around me. Gravity has always been a mystery and it seems ridiculous that in 2005, now 2010, (It's been 5 years!) that nobody has a clue. This being unacceptable, I took on the challenge and here it is;

Observe how thin the atmosphere is compared to the Earth's diameter. Gravity is not a very strong force after all.
Photo Courtesy of NASA's Visible Earth

Gravity is the weak electrostatic attraction between atoms.

Gravity is a simple Electro Mechanical System.
The attractive forces are greater than the repulsive
between atoms
because the attractive work together.
It's like two against one.
For example, take two hydrogen atoms;



    To physically experience the effect, get two magnets and push
the two N together. Notice how they deflect.

Now try N to S and you will see they are always
locked in because they work together.

Electrostatics behave in the same manner.
The attractive are always greater than the repulsive.

Most will disagree with my assumption that attraction
is greater than repulsion. I received this argument;

“Orbits are an equilibrium of forces. One aspect of inequality is mass differences,
but the forces are equal and opposite in
Newton's mechanics”.

That is correct inside any particular atom or if there were only one atom in the universe.
Because the electromagnetic (electrostatic) range is infinite, (It's the law and is self evident)
there is a very slight attraction between atoms.
I think that nothing can be discovered when trying to look at the atom from a Quantum Mechanical perspective.


One must be mindful that Q-M remains to be the underlying operating system.

For simplicity sake we will have to start with some Hydrogen atoms.

Observe this example of a two, three, and four Hydrogen Atom gravitational system;   

    Now, multiply this concept to equal the number of atoms in the Earth and everything on it, and there you have it! Gravity. Every atom in a system is interconnected. All atoms have different gravitational properties depending on their atomic number. It becomes a random additive field.

Because the attraction decreases by the square as the distance doubles (from the collective source), the atoms closest to you under your feet are having more effect than those on the other side of the planet. If you are driving your car from say, New Haven, CT, to Ocean City, MD, a whole group of different atoms are taking over as you travel along.

And, as you travel away from the Earth, it all appears as a point source.

I have been selling this idea for years with little success. One trusted and valued colleague offered it as a “residual”. I like that viewpoint. When I asked him “Why does no one see this mechanism as a viable explanation?” He offered;

“Whether it’s a vested interest or Pavlovian response, they cling to their beliefs like religious zealots.”

      Those are powerful words that reflect a truthful perspective. I, myself think two things;

1.     When it comes to solving the mystery of gravity, nobody actually cares to give it a thought, and if you do, you’re considered “crazy”. Most are concerned with getting through daily hassles. In today's complex world and working enviornments, most are required to become specialists. This is true in even within the scope of electrical contracting for example. What is required is stepping back, looking at the big picture, and a bit of common sense with an objective perspective.

2.      The current thinking in this area is built on 17th century thinking. This different perspective has been simply overlooked based on what has been en-grained in current curriculum. Thinking in this area has always been left to those who can afford to do so. This is common in all areas of human endeavor.

Apparently, it has been difficult throughout history for new ideas to gain acceptance.
The following quotes seem to apply;

"A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them
see the light,but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation
grows up that is familiar with it": Max Planck –

"First they tell you you're wrong and they can prove it; then they tell you you're right but it
isn't important; then they tell you it's important but they knew it all along": Charles Kettering –


So now all the below arises;
1. There is zero gravity at the center of the Earth.
2. Gravity varies by atomic number as demonstrated by the USGS gravitational surveys in Nevada and Afghanistan.
3. A gravimeter lowered down the deepest oil well will show a decrease in gravity.

The Gravitational Aether progresses in a spiraling manner creating the observed atmospheric events.
It's not possible to draw because it's three dimensional. Here's a crude rendition;

 
The moon creates the tides;

     
To me, all things are basically simple. Gravity is simple. It's incoherent magnetism.
In that each atom is a tiny weak magnet. (some better than others)
They are not all pointed in the same direction and can't be aligned to do so as in an Iron magnet.
You are walking around on this planet. You have to admit, it feels like a big magnet.
Bringing in a bit of Henri Poincare (April 29, 1854-July 17, 1912),
and a bit of Walter Babin (www.wbabin.net), Gravity becomes;
The Dynamical Chaotic Residual of the Incoherent Magnetism of
all the individual atoms contained in a body or system.
A picture is worth a thousand words and maybe 100,000 math formulas.
Because gravity is a Dynamical Chaotic Residual, it cannot be discovered through mathematics.
Gravity must be visualized as a mechanical system that can be then generally described by mathematics.
The more atoms you have, the more gravity you have!!
See “The Unified Theory” on my site for more.

Thank you for your time


Why All Objects Fall at the Same Rate

January 16, 2010

Author: Eric Sabo East Haddam, CT

 

  

            Early on in this website endeavor, I had received an email from someone anonymous and the subject was “Gravity Bumber” and simply said “All things fall at the same time.” My reply was “I assume you meant Bummer” and suggested spell check. I assumed he meant rate. I then said “the difference in mass between a feather and a bowling ball in a vacuum with respect to the gravitational field of the Earth was zero.” I thought that was sufficient and sounded like a good answer and I never gave it much thought after that.

 

            But then the other day, I was watching “The top 100 discoveries in physics” on the science channel. This show had “Bill Nye the Science Guy” talking about gravity and how all things fall at the same rate. He was at a site where a large vacuum chamber was constructed in order to drop objects of different sizes to accurately measure their rate of fall. The sizes ranged from small items to 5 tons. It started me thinking that maybe a more detailed explanation was in order.

 

            If we recap the gravity explanation; It’s a dynamical chaotic residual. It’s weak incoherent magnetism. Think of it as each atom in a body is a tiny spinning magnet. They’re not all pointed in the same direction. They can’t be made to do so. That’s where the “Dynamical Chaos” comes into play. It takes a tremendous number of atoms for the gravitational field to be of consequence. Like something the size of the earth. Because the electromagnetic range is infinite, all the individual positive components in one body attract the individual negative in another, and vice versa. All of the individual positives repel all the individual positives All of the individual negative, repel the individual negative but this is at a lesser quantity than the attractive force. This is because the attractive are locked into each other and the repulsive deflect. Observe;

The repulsive forces however, are at action in the gravitational process. That’s why things don’t fall at the speed of light. The reason all things fall at the same rate is this;

 

            As a bowling ball or the 5 ton weight is hanging in Bill Nye’s vacuum chamber by the suspension cable, they have a weight that can be measured by a load cell in line with the cable. This is because all the atoms in the suspended weight are chemically bound and are grouped. The sum of the group is its weight. The instant the cable is released, the object becomes weightless. It doesn’t matter how many atoms are in the object at this point because the gravitational Aether acts on each individual atom contained in the object. The gravitational Aether having attractive and repulsive components with the attractive overcoming the repulsive because they work together, has a set rate of attraction that acts on the individual atoms in the falling body. The repulsive does the same. The more atoms, the attraction and repulsion increase proportionally at the same time. It is of no consequence how many atoms are in the body because gravity acts on each individual atom in a body. It is only when the body comes to rest on the surface, that the object can be again weighed. All falling objects have a weight equal to zero. They all weigh the same while falling, no matter what their mass.

 

            The rate of fall is set by the repulsive forces. The best analogy is the World Trade Center collapse. When the top section fell, it didn’t shoot straight to the ground. It had to crush its way through the supporting structure below. This slowed the decent, but the decent proceeded none the less.

 

 

                                                                        Thank you for your time,

 

                                                                        Eric Sabo

 

 

 


                         Albert Einstein and Gravity - a Commentary

 

 

 

 

 

 

Author; Eric Sabo, East Haddam, Ct.

Jan. 22, 2009

 

         Einstein tells us that gravity is the result of a massive body distorting the space-time continuum. Yet, he fails to explain exactly why the massive body distorts the continuum. Enter my gravitational explanation. I refer to it as an explanation rather than a theory because my explanation is what gravity is and it can be nothing else. Anyone with the least bit of common sense can easily see that.

 

         It becomes apparent that Einstein’s work is an expansion of Newton. It is a more complex mathematical expression that does not actually give the cause of gravity. It’s a different mathematical perspective on how gravity manifests itself as a curvature of space-time.  To determine the cause, gravity must be first visualized for what it is, an electro-mechanical system. Then, mathematics can be applied to describe it. In the case of Gravity, Newton, and Einstein, it’s obvious that the proverbial “cart had been placed before the horse”.

 

         This is not a problem in that all the mathematical work is completed. The cause becomes unimportant. But, maybe it is. Einstein’s expansion of Newton, gives us many important clues to the physical makeup of what exists around us. For example; Einstein tells us that as a body is accelerated towards the speed of light, it gains mass. The question becomes, does it really gain mass or just appear to? If the body does gain mass, where does it acquire that mass from? Enter my Subspace or CMBR speculations. It could even be a combination of the two.

 

         Regarding the equation E=MC². The formula is developed in Einstein’s June 30, 1905 paper “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies”. In reviewing the document, the actual formula appears as;

 

It seems to me that he was not directly stating that W (E) was what you get when converting matter to energy. But rather, how mass-energy increases with respect to the speed of light (c). If the mass is at rest, the second half of the equation becomes moot giving W(E) = mc². He clearly was not thinking of nuclear fission and seems he more unwittingly came upon the conversion that persisted more as rumor and speculation until the gadjet at Trinity. Personally, when I first looked at the formula , what immediately popped into mind was; If you accelerate a fission bomb to near light speed, the yeild would increase exponentially! If that is the case, you might want to get it up to speed in less than ten generations to avoid spontaneous supercriticality due to increase in mass of the device. We’ll have to wait some time to try that experiment.

 

         Speaking of experiments, I have a simple relativity experiment that you can try for yourself.

The next time you are alone in an elevator, when going up or down, walk around in a circle. When the elevator stops, be prepared to grab onto something. From your perspective, you walked around in a circle. But you’re inner ear cannot be deceived. You actually walked around in a helical path and the effects of the conflict are quite pronounced. I’m not sure this experiment has any relevance.

(Persons with inner ear infection, balance problems, or dizziness should not attempt this. Also, you might not want to tell anyone you tried this if you did.)

 

                                                                                 Thank you for your time.

                                                                                   Eric Sabo